Uverejnen\u00e9<\/a> v registri v m\u00e1ji 2024 sa incident stal v novembri 2022 na \u00fazem\u00ed jednej z vojensk\u00fdch jednotiek vo \u013dvove, ke\u010f boli na cvi\u010disku napl\u00e1novan\u00e9 kurzy po\u017eiarneho v\u00fdcviku a arm\u00e1da sa pripravovala na stre\u013ebu. R\u00e1no 19. novembra obvinen\u00fd spolu s \u010fal\u0161\u00edmi vojakmi finan\u010dnej a hospod\u00e1rskej slu\u017eby vojenskej jednotky dostal krabicu so zbra\u0148ami a strelivom a priniesol ju do jednej z kancel\u00e1ri\u00ed.<\/p>\nPod\u013ea vy\u0161etrovania obvinen\u00fd, ke\u010f bol v kancel\u00e1rii, vyzdvihol pi\u0161to\u013e TT od in\u00e9ho vojaka, 46-ro\u010dn\u00e9ho plukovn\u00edka tejto vojenskej jednotky Volodymyra Sukholytkyiho, ktor\u00fd bol tie\u017e v kancel\u00e1rii. Vy\u0161etrovanie tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee vojak neskontroloval pr\u00edtomnos\u0165 z\u00e1sobn\u00edka v pi\u0161toli, nabil ho a po n\u00e1vrate k plukovn\u00edkovi ho zastrelil – plukovn\u00edk zomrel v d\u00f4sledku poranenia brucha. V rozsudku sa uv\u00e1dza, \u017ee vojak poru\u0161il pravidl\u00e1 manipul\u00e1cie so zbra\u0148ami a plukovn\u00edka zastrelil z nedbanlivosti.<\/p>\n
Na s\u00fade ob\u017ealovan\u00fd priznal vinu a uviedol, \u017ee plukovn\u00edk mu dal svoju pi\u0161to\u013e na kontrolu. Potom vojak prist\u00fapil k in\u00e9mu vojakovi a uk\u00e1zal mu pi\u0161to\u013e, oto\u010dil sa a „z jemu nezn\u00e1mych d\u00f4vodov v tom \u010dase zaznel v\u00fdstrel a gu\u013eka letela smerom k plukovn\u00edkovi, ktor\u00fd st\u00e1l pri svojom stole“.<\/p>\n
\u00abNevie, ako kazeta skon\u010dila v pi\u0161toli, preto\u017ee zbra\u0148, z\u00e1sobn\u00edky na \u0148u a strelivo boli v\u017edy oddelen\u00e9. Poznamenal, \u017ee iba d\u00f4stojn\u00edci a in\u00ed vojaci mali gu\u013eomety. Nikdy nevystrelil z pi\u0161tole, iba ju vy\u010distil. Obvinen\u00fd \u010dinil pok\u00e1nie z toho, \u010do urobil, a \u017eiadal, aby nebol pr\u00edsne potrestan\u00fd. Na s\u00fadnom pojedn\u00e1van\u00ed sa obetiam ospravedlnil a \u013eutoval, \u017ee sa to stalo<\/em>„, – v\u00fdpove\u010f obvinen\u00e9ho je citovan\u00e1 vo verdikte s\u00fadu.<\/p>\nProti vojakovi bolo za\u010dat\u00e9 trestn\u00e9 konanie pod\u013ea \u010dasti 2 \u010dl\u00e1nku 414 trestn\u00e9ho z\u00e1kona (poru\u0161enie pravidiel pre manipul\u00e1ciu so zbra\u0148ami). Pr\u00edpad posudzoval sudca Roman Holovatyi, ktor\u00fd presk\u00famal v\u0161etky materi\u00e1ly a uznal obvinen\u00e9ho vinn\u00fdm z poru\u0161enia pravidiel manipul\u00e1cie so zbra\u0148ami, \u010do sp\u00f4sobilo smr\u0165 obete. Bol ods\u00faden\u00fd na p\u00e4\u0165 rokov v\u00e4zenia, ale prepusten\u00fd z v\u00fdkonu trestu s trojro\u010dnou sk\u00fa\u0161obnou dobou. Sudca vzal do \u00favahy „\u00faprimn\u00e9 pok\u00e1nie vojaka a akt\u00edvna pomoc pri rie\u0161en\u00ed trestn\u00e9ho \u010dinu<\/em>\u00bb.<\/p>\nMan\u017eelka zosnul\u00e9ho plukovn\u00edka Olha Sukholytka n\u00e1m povedala, \u017ee s rozsudkom nes\u00fahlas\u00ed a odvol\u00e1 sa. Pr\u00edbuzn\u00ed plukovn\u00edka nevideli \u00faprimn\u00fa \u013e\u00fatos\u0165 obvinen\u00e9ho a povedali, \u017ee a\u017e do konca s\u00fadneho procesu na s\u00fade nepripustil, \u017ee stla\u010dil sp\u00fa\u0161\u0165. Pod\u013ea Olhy Sukholytky vojak tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee zbra\u0148 mu dal plukovn\u00edk, ale vy\u0161etrovanie dok\u00e1zalo, \u017ee tak\u00e9to povolenie nedostal. Obvinen\u00fd nenahradil po\u0161koden\u00fdm sp\u00f4soben\u00fa \u0161kodu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Ly\u010dakivsk\u00fd okresn\u00fd s\u00fad vo \u013dvove ods\u00fadil star\u0161ieho vojaka, ktor\u00fd kv\u00f4li neopatrn\u00e9mu zaobch\u00e1dzaniu so zbra\u0148ami zastrelil 46-ro\u010dn\u00e9ho plukovn\u00edka Volodymyra Sucholyck\u00e9ho vo \u013dvove. S\u00fad ods\u00fadil vojaka na p\u00e4\u0165 rokov v\u00e4zenia, ale prepustil ho z v\u00fdkonu trestu s trojro\u010dnou sk\u00fa\u0161obnou dobou. Pr\u00edbuzn\u00ed zosnul\u00e9ho sa proti rozsudku odvolaj\u00fa. Ako sa uv\u00e1dza vo verdikte s\u00fadu, ktor\u00fd Uverejnen\u00e9 v registri v […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":25658,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[307,3273,3274,6,2899,3272,96],"class_list":["post-25657","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-vojna-v-ukrajine","tag-nehoda","tag-olga-sukholytka","tag-rimska-holovaty","tag-rusko-ukrajinska-vojna","tag-vojenske-tabory","tag-volodymyr-sukholytkyi","tag-zbran"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ruwar.org\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25657","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ruwar.org\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ruwar.org\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ruwar.org\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ruwar.org\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25657"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ruwar.org\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25657\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ruwar.org\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/25658"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ruwar.org\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25657"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ruwar.org\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25657"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ruwar.org\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25657"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}